YuHeng's blog

Negation has prerequisies. It’s another good warm day. Smooth and untethered. Smooth because of vicissitudes. Vicissitudes because of ease. And so with both, I experience smoothness and content and troubledness with another attitude; they are no longer what they were. They are now new, different, evolved, born out of a new shell, metamorphisizing. Negation has prerequisites. I have changed, and so has things around me. Their change has not changed. Negation depends on prerequisites. Things remain the same. But with change, it does not. I have changed. They have not. Whether they change or not does not depend on me. Their truth does not concern me. They can change, but I do not have to. And that would not be good. That would be troublesome, because my change would depend on changing and not changing with the things that change. Changes are like subclauses; their truths point to the same reference, assuming that the truth itself is constant. And so, if it was constant, then subclauses would have to be true to make the whole sentence itself true. And so, changes are like subclauses, which are true if i so wish the truth to be true, not false. So, I… conjoin the truth with the matter-of-facts of natures, so that I can in fact, utilize negation; negations have prerequisites. i can now, negate something.